You are being transferred
A perspective and challenge

in terms of the risk of sexual abuse, the most dangerous place for a child is their own home, and the most dangerous people are not intruders or strangers, but family and friends
He argues that such data does not support any direct link between mandatory celibacy and paedophilia. The data also shows that children are at no greater risk in ‘the setting of the Roman Catholic Church than in any other setting where adults have unsupervised access to children’. Would that the risk were not present at all. But that would be pretending that the Church is cocooned off from the rest oft the world. We must seek to make our institutions and ourselves as accountable as possible.
He then goes on to challenge some of the institutionalised ways of behaving which characterise us as Church. His critique does not make for easy reading, but then conversion is not easy. Do read the article.
You may not agree with everything, but he seeks to ground his critique in the demands of the Gospel and it is that spirit that we should read it. His peroration is hopeful:

Jesus shares our life: not just those aspects which we might see as ‘more appropriate’, but all that makes up our life. And in sharing our life, Jesus opens it to the power of the resurrection – not just those aspects which we might see as ‘more appropriate’, but all that makes up our life. So it is in the presence of the Resurrected One that we move into this period of Kairos, where by facing the brokenness and sin that are part of our story as Church, we can allow the Spirit of Jesus to lead us into a still deeper conversion as Church, and so recover the deeper and fuller story that tells us what it is to be the community of the followers of Jesus.
'For papa Benedetto

The mob and the empty vessels

And an atheist reflects critically on the vitriol of Dawkins et al. The article makes mention of Dawkins’s recent views on the scandal of child abuse; read about them for yourself. He has had a rather dramatic change of heart!
The righteous Fran, the actor and the Cardinal
This morning’s Breakfast programme on Radio National included an interesting interview with Sir Ian McKellan, a fine actor. The interview was spoilt because of the ultimate question; Fran asked Sir Ian about Cardinal Bertone’s comments linking homosexuality and paedophilia. The response was to be expected. It was the response Fran expected, but why was it asked? Does she ask every guest on the show about things of which they have no particular knowledge? Does she ask every guest to give vent to their prejudices? Was any context offered? Fran was looking for sensationalism and got it. Perhaps she should leave journalism behind and become a shock-jock in name as well as in truth.
On the point of the Cardinal Secretary of State’s comment. Cardinal Bertone said that there is a connexion between homosexuality and paedophilia. At the time I thought it worded ambiguously and so somewhat unfortunate. Fr Lombardi has sought to clarify the comments.
• He starts out by making the obvious point that we have to depend on experts: ‘Ecclesial authorities do not consider it within their competency to make general affirmations of a specifically psychological or medical character and therefore naturally must refer to the study of specialists and the inquiries they carry out.’
• He then states that the Cardinal was referring to the problem of abuse in the Church and not commenting on the problem as it exists in the world at large - ‘alla problematica degli abusi all'interno della Chiesa e non nella popolazione mondiale’.
• Church statistics reveal that of the abuse committed by churchmen, 10% is paedophilia in the strict sense, 90% is ephebophilia which involves adolescents. When one breaks down the latter category, 60% is committed with an individual of the same sex and 30% is heterosexual in character - ‘in cui si parlava di un 10% di casi di pedofilia in senso stretto, e di un 90% di casi da definire piuttosto di efebofilia (cioè nei confronti di adolescenti), dei quali circa il 60% riferito a individui dello stesso sesso e il 30% di carattere eterosessuale»’
The media have criticised the Cardinal for making uninformed comment, but it seems to me that that was just what Fran Kelly and Sir Ian were doing on the ABC. They were just giving vent to their prejudices, speaking of a criminal act committed by a tiny minority of priests. It was uninformed comment, but obviously Fran is convinced that she is on the side of the angels and so is not open to other perspectives.

By the bye, McKellan’s comment won’t stop my trying to see Waiting for Godot.
A must read article
Explanation of procedures
The text of the explanation as published by the Vatican Information Service is as follows:
A: Preliminary Procedures
The local diocese investigates every allegation of sexual abuse of a minor by a cleric.
If the allegation has a semblance of truth the case is referred to the CDF. The local bishop transmits all the necessary information to the CDF and expresses his opinion on the procedures to be followed and the measures to be adopted in the short and long term.
Civil law concerning reporting of crimes to the appropriate authorities should always be followed.
During the preliminary stage and until the case is concluded, the bishop may impose precautionary measures to safeguard the community, including the victims. Indeed, the local bishop always retains power to protect children by restricting the activities of any priest in his diocese. This is part of his ordinary authority, which he is encouraged to exercise to whatever extent is necessary to assure that children do not come to harm, and this power can be exercised at the bishop's discretion before, during and after any canonical proceeding.
B: Procedures authorized by the CDF
The CDF studies the case presented by the local bishop and also asks for supplementary information where necessary.
The CDF has a number of options:
B1 Penal Processes
The CDF may authorize the local bishop to conduct a judicial penal trial before a local Church tribunal. Any appeal in such cases would eventually be lodged to a tribunal of the CDF.
The CDF may authorize the local bishop to conduct an administrative penal process before a delegate of the local bishop assisted by two assessors. The accused priest is called to respond to the accusations and to review the evidence. The accused has a right to present recourse to the CDF against a decree condemning him to a canonical penalty. The decision of the Cardinals members of the CDF is final.
Should the cleric be judged guilty, both judicial and administrative penal processes can condemn a cleric to a number of canonical penalties, the most serious of which is dismissal from the clerical state. The question of damages can also be treated directly during these procedures.
B2 Cases referred directly to the Holy Father
In very grave cases where a civil criminal trial has found the cleric guilty of sexual abuse of minors or where the evidence is overwhelming, the CDF may choose to take the case directly to the Holy Father with the request that the Pope issue a decree of "ex officio" dismissal from the clerical state. There is no canonical remedy against such a papal decree.
The CDF also brings to the Holy Father requests by accused priests who, cognizant of their crimes, ask to be dispensed from the obligation of the priesthood and want to return to the lay state. The Holy Father grants these requests for the good of the Church ("pro bono Ecclesiae").
B3 Disciplinary Measures
In cases where the accused priest has admitted to his crimes and has accepted to live a life of prayer and penance, the CDF authorizes the local bishop to issue a decree prohibiting or restricting the public ministry of such a priest. Such decrees are imposed through a penal precept which would entail a canonical penalty for a violation of the conditions of the decree, not excluding dismissal from the clerical state. Administrative recourse to the CDF is possible against such decrees. The decision of the CDF is final.
C. Revision of MP SST
For some time the CDF has undertaken a revision of some of the articles of "Motu Proprio Sacramentorum Sanctitatis tutela", in order to update the said Motu Proprio of 2001 in the light of special faculties granted to the CDF by Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI. The proposed modifications under discussion will not change the above-mentioned procedures (A, B1-B3)
For shame Prime Minister
“You that are accursed, depart from me into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels; for I was hungry and you gave me no food, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not welcome me, naked and you did not give me clothing, sick and in prison and you did not visit me.” Then they also will answer, “Lord, when was it that we saw you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not take care of you?” Then he will answer them, “Truly I tell you, just as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to me.”
Good web site
Calumny - not my ABC
Here is what Phil Lawlor wrote on the ‘smoking gun’ in CatholicCulture.org
• Was Cardinal Ratzinger responding to the complaints of priestly pedophilia? No. The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which the future Pontiff headed, did not have jurisdiction for pedophile priests until 2001. The cardinal was weighing a request for laicization of Kiesle.
• Had Oakland's Bishop John Cummins sought to laicize Kiesle as punishment for his misconduct? No. Kiesle himself asked to be released from the priesthood. The bishop supported the wayward priest's application.
• Was the request for laicization denied? No. Eventually, in 1987, the Vatican approved Kiesle's dismissal from the priesthood.
• Did Kiesle abuse children again before he was laicized? To the best of our knowledge, No. The next complaints against him arose in 2002: 15 years after he was dismissed from the priesthood.
• Did Cardinal Ratzinger's reluctance to make a quick decision mean that Kiesle remained in active ministry? No. Bishop Cummins had the authority to suspend the predator-priest, and in fact he had placed him on an extended leave of absence long before the application for laicization was entered.
• Would quicker laicization have protected children in California? No. Cardinal Ratzinger did not have the power to put Kiesle behind bars. If Kiesle had been defrocked in 1985 instead of 1987, he would have remained at large, thanks to a light sentence from the California courts. As things stood, he remained at large. He was not engaged in parish ministry and had no special access to children.
• Did the Vatican cover up evidence of Kiesle's predatory behavior? No. The civil courts of California destroyed that evidence after the priest completed a sentence of probation-- before the case ever reached Rome.
So to review: This was not a case in which a bishop wanted to discipline his priest and the Vatican official demurred. This was not a case in which a priest remained active in ministry, and the Vatican did nothing to protect the children under his pastoral care. This was not a case in which the Vatican covered up evidence of a priest's misconduct. This was a case in which a priest asked to be released from his vows, and the Vatican-- which had been flooded by such requests throughout the 1970s -- wanted to consider all such cases carefully. In short, if you're looking for evidence of a sex-abuse crisis in the Catholic Church, this case is irrelevant.
Good News





99.6%
The Church needs to get her house in order and Pope Benedict is leading us in the right direction. The lack of perspective in the media - the ABC has been egregious in its coverage - hinders society’s dealing with the issue. That bigot, Negus, is no credit to SBS either.
'Following Holy Week, holding our course'

Padre Frederico Lombardi SJ, the Holy See Press Office Director, has issued a text which merits our consideration:
“The debate concerning sexual abuse, and not only that committed by the clergy, continues with news items and comments of various kinds. How can we sail through these stormy waters while maintaining a secure course and responding to the evangelical motto 'Duc in altum - Put out into the deep'?
In the first place, by continuing to seek truth, and peace for the victims. One of the most striking things is that today so many inner wounds are coming to light, wounds that also date to many years (sometimes decades) ago, but evidently still open, Many victims do not seek financial compensation but inner assistance, a judgement on their painful individual experiences. There is something that we have yet to fully understand; perhaps we need a more profound experience of events that have had such a negative impact on the lives of individuals, of the Church and of society. One example of this, at the collective level, is the hatred and violence of conflicts between peoples which are, as we see, so difficult to overcome in true reconciliation. Abuse opens wounds at a deep inner level. For this reason, certain episcopates were right when they courageously resumed developing ways and places in which victims could express themselves freely, listening to them without taking it for granted that the problem had already been faced and overcome by the workshops established sometime ago. For this reason also, other episcopates and individual bishops were right to intervene paternally, showing spiritual, liturgical and human concern for victims. It seems certain that the number of new accusations of abuse is falling, as is happening in the United States, but for many people the road to profound healing is only now beginning, and for others it has yet to start. In the context of this concern for victims, the Pope has written of his readiness to hold new meetings with then, thus sharing in the journey of the entire ecclesial community. But this journey, in order to achieve profound effects, must take place in respect for people and the search for peace.
Alongside concern for victims we must continue to implement, decisively and truthfully, the correct procedures for the canonical judgement of the guilty, and for collaborating with the civil authorities in matters concerning their judicial and penal competencies, taking the specific norms and situations of the various countries into account. Only in this way can we hope effectively to rebuild a climate of justice and complete trust in the ecclesiastical institution. It has happened that a number of leaders of communities and institutions, through inexperience or unpreparedness, have not had a ready understanding of the protocols and criteria for intervention which could have helped them intervene decisively even when this was very difficult or painful for them, also because they were often surprised by the accusations. But, while civil law intervenes through general norms, canon law must take account of the specific moral gravity of an abuse of the trust placed in persons who hold positions of responsibility within the ecclesial community, and of the flagrant contradiction with the conduct they should show. In this sense, transparency and rigour are urgent requirements if the Church is to bear witness to wise and just government.
The formation and selection of candidates for the priesthood, and more generally of the staff of educational and pastoral institutions, is the basis for an effective prevention of the risk of future abuses. Achieving a healthy maturity of the personality, also from a sexual point of view, has always been a difficult challenge, but today it is particularly so, although the best psychological and medical knowledge is of great help in spiritual and moral formation. It has been observed that the greatest frequency of abuses coincided with the most intense period of the 'sexual revolution' of past decades. Formation must take account of this context and of the more general context of secularisation. In the final analysis, this means rediscovering and reaffirming the sense and importance of sexuality, chastity and emotional relationships in today's world, and doing so in concrete, not just verbal or abstract, terms. What a source of disorder and suffering their violation or undervaluation can be! As the Pope observed in his Letter to Irish Catholics, a Christian priestly life today can respond to the requirements of its vocation only by truly nourishing itself at the wellspring of faith and friendship with Christ.
People who love truth and the objective evaluation of problems will know where to seek and find information for a more overall comprehension of the problem of paedophilia and the sexual abuse of minors in our time, in different countries, understanding its range and pervasiveness. Thus they will be able to achieve a better understanding of the degree to which the Catholic Church shares problems that are not only her own, to what extent they have particular gravity for her and require specific interventions,and, finally, the extent to which the experience the Church is going through in this field may also be useful for other institutions or for society as a whole. In this context, we truly feel that the communications media have not yet worked sufficiently, especially in countries in which the Church has a stronger presence and in which she is more easily subject to criticism. Yet, documents such as the national US report on the mistreatment of children deserve to be better known in order to understand what fields require urgent social intervention, and the proportions of the problem. In the U.S.A. in 2008 alone, 62,000 people were identified as having committed acts of abuse against minors, while the proportion of Catholic priests was so small as not to be taken into consideration as a group.
The protection of minors and young people is, then, an immense and unlimited field, which goes well beyond the specific problem concerning certain members of the clergy. People who sensitively, generously and attentively dedicate their efforts to this problem deserve gratitude, respect and encouragement from everyone, especially from the ecclesial and civil authorities. Theirs is an essential contribution for the serenity and credibility of the education and formation of young people, both inside and outside the Church. The Pope rightly expressed words of great appreciation for them in his Letter to Irish Catholics, though naturally with a view to a vaster horizon.
Finally, Pope Benedict XVI, a coherent guide along the path of rigour and truth, merits all respect and support, testimony of which is reaching him from all parts of the Church. He is a pastor well capable of facing - with great rectitude and confidence - this difficult time in which there is no lack of criticism and unfounded insinuations. It must be said that he is a Pope who has spoken a lot about the Truth of God and about respect for truth; and he has become a credible witness of this. We accompany him, learning from him the constancy necessary to grow in truth and transparency, continuing to open our horizons to the serious problems of the world and responding patiently to the slow and gradual release of partial or presumed 'revelations' which seek to undermined his credibility, and that of other institutions or individuals of the Church.
This patient and solid love of truth is necessary, in the Church, in the society in which we live, in communicating and in writing, if we wish to serve rather than confuse our fellow men and women".
Counter-current
Neither attempts to absolve the Church from blame (and nor should they), but they offer some balance and proper perspective. The Australian, another Murdoch paper, has printed a few different perspectives lately. Here’s one. Please note the figure he quotes: approximately 1 in 200 priests have had allegations of sexual impropriety levelled against them. Even 1 in 200 is too high, but it means that 99.5% of priests have never been accused of abuse.
Going against the flow
I am not sure that I would agree with his comparing the Holy See and the State of Israel, but it is interesting to note that the Jewish friend whom Padre Cantalamessa quoted in his homily is not alone in his sympathy for the Vatican.
A few of the points Dan Segre makes:
‘There is a link between these attacks on the Church and the persecution of the Jews. This consists of two elements: 1) The inability of the Vatican State and the State of Israel (inasmuch as it is erroneously identified with Judaism) to deal with a media attack aimed at delegitimisation; 2) the differing abilities of the Church and the Synagogue to explain the meaning of ‘election’ which the two defend.’
He also seems to support Cardinal Etchegeray’s assertion that the Church is ‘disliked especially by those do not support her action in defence of the sanctity of the family founded on marriage between man and woman, the more just distribution of the earth’s resources and a ethical alternative to the profit logic.’
YouTube
Cantalamessa apologises
Cantalamessa said that he did not intend to offend anyone and he had wanted to make use of the opportunity presented by the coincidence of the Jewish and Christian Passovers to greet the Jewish people. He inserted the letter from a Jewish friend because it seemed to him to express solidarity with the Pope in the face of unrelenting attacks on him.
*******
Hopefully this will draw a line under the affair. Perhaps some may read the whole of the homily and be inspired by the challenge Cantalamessa placed before the congregation.
Two more excerpts:
«We have an example in the recurrent violence of youth in the stadium, in the bullying in schools and in certain square manifestations that leave behind destruction and debris. A generation of youth that has had the very rare privilege of not knowing a real war and of never having been called to arms, amuses itself (because it is about a game, even if stupid and at times tragic) to invent little wars, driven by the same instinct that moved the primordial horde.»
«John Paul II inaugurated the practice of the request for forgiveness for collective wrongs. One of these, among the most just and necessary, is the forgiveness that half of humanity must ask of the other half, men to women. It must not be generic or abstract. It must lead, especially in one who professes himself a Christian, to concrete gestures of conversion, to words of apology and reconciliation within families and in society.»
Surrexit Dominus vere!
Et apparuit Simoni!
The Lord has truly risen! And has appeared to Simon!
Padre Cantalamessa
«This is an occasion to make persons and institutions that fight against it understand that Christ is their best ally.
It is a violence all the more grave in as much as it is often carried out in the shelter of domestic walls, unknown to all, when it is not actually justified with pseudo-religious and cultural prejudices. The victims find themselves desperately alone and defenseless. Only today, thanks to the support and encouragement of so many associations and institutions, some find the strength to come out in the open and denounce the guilty.
Much of this violence has a sexual background. It is the male who thinks he can demonstrate his virility by inflicting himself on the woman, without realizing that he is only demonstrating his insecurity and baseness. Also in confrontations with the woman who has made a mistake, what a contrast between the conduct of Christ and that still going on in certain environments! Fanaticism calls for stoning; Christ responds to the men who have presented an adulteress to him saying: "Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone at her" (John 8:7). Adultery is a sin that is always committed by two, but for which only one has always been (and, in some parts of the world, still is) punished.
Violence against woman is never so odious as when it nestles where mutual respect and love should reign, in the relationship between husband and wife. It is true that violence is not always and wholly on the part of one, that one can be violent also with the tongue and not only with the hands, but no one can deny that in the vast majority of cases the victim is the woman.
There are families where the man still believes himself authorized to raise his voice and hands on the women of the house. Wife and children at times live under the constant threat of "Daddy's anger." To such as these it is necessary to say courteously: dear men colleagues, by creating you male, God did not intend to give you the right to be angry and to bang your fist on the table for the least thing. The word addressed to Eve after the fault: "He (the man) shall rule over you" (Genesis 3:16), was a bitter forecast, not an authorization.»
Retraction
I am also glad that the Minister is holding fast against the howls of the Opposition as they seek to stir up fear with regard to refugees. Shame, Mr Abbott, shame!
from Dublin
«Many ask me: “How could such harm have been done within the Church of Christ; How can I remain in such a church? “
The only answer is for us to remember that the Church is the Church of Jesus Christ and it is his self-giving alone that brings hope for renewal and give the strength to remain faithful to his message and his mission. Reform and renewal in the Church, sorely needed, can never be a task which we as humans can undertake on our own. It will only come when we convert, that is when we change direction in our lives, and allow Christ’s example of fidelity to be the driving force in our lives. Reform in the Church will come when we all reform.
You may reply: "I have no responsibility for what happened. Why ask me to repent and convert?” Jesus though innocent, gave himself so that others might live. Reform of the Church must come from within us. It must come from a change within each of us. It is not a question of us asking how I can remain in such a Church, but rather that as the disciples of Jesus we all take responsibly for the Church, but within the Church, within a community of men and women who believe and who live out the love of God in their lives. The Church will not be reformed as the Church of Christ by cries from outside, of those who do not believe. Renewal is a matter of faith and of understanding what it means that Jesus’ kingdom is not of this world. His kingdom is not of this world but it must be realised day by day within this world, by those who understand the meaning of Christ’s self-giving love, which aimed not to save himself but to bring life to others.»
from Westminster
«Just before we end Mass today, I would like to add a few words about the widespread reports of child abuse in the Catholic Church and all the accompanying comment.
First, and most importantly, we think of those who have been damaged by childhood abuse with all its lasting effects. We must readily express our sorrow and apologies. We are properly and shocked and shamed by each and all such acts which are a dreadful breaking of trust. We are also firmly resolved to continue all our work of safeguarding.
Secondly, attempts to implicate Pope Benedict are unworthy. Every time you read that the 2001 document from the Holy See imposed a duty on bishops to keep these things secret and hidden from public authorities, know that this is simply untrue.
There is nothing in that document to deter or hinder a bishop or a victim from reporting cases to the police. In fact since that time, when the Holy See directly called for greater vigilance and scrutiny, bishops have been urged to take that course of action.
Thirdly, please remember that in the last forty years the vast majority of priests in England and Wales – 99.6% to be precise – have never had such allegations made against them. But even one case is too many. Every single case is, and always will be, a sin and a scandal, damaging its victims and shaming us all. All of this we commit to the Lord in this Holy Week. From him alone, through his wounds, can come the healing we need.
There is a vivid phrase to recall: Trust comes on foot but leaves on horseback. It is on foot, through our daily actions, that trust is strengthened. We know that. That is what we do. And there is great trust among us – rightly given and received.
So, before the blessing, let me again thank all our priests here today for their goodness and hard work. I appreciate them and assure them of my love and support. I am sure you all do the same!»
Setting the record straight
et non tradat eum in animam inimicorum eius
We need to pray that the Lord will strengthen the Pope; Jesus’ words to Peter are apposite: «I have prayed for you, Simon, that your faith may not fail, and once you have recovered, you in your turn must strengthen your brothers.»
V. Oremus pro Pontifice nostro Benedicto.
V. Let us pray for Benedict, our Pope.
R. Dominus conservet eum, et vivificet eum, et beatum faciat eum in terra, et non tradat eum in animam inimicorum eius. [Ps 40:3]
R. May the Lord preserve him, give him life, make him blessed upon the earth, and deliver him not up to the will of his enemies.
Papal Letter
The Holy Father has expressed his sorrow for the sufferings of the innocent. Some, including victims’ groups, have welcomed it, but others have said that it is not enough. I do not think we can expect one letter to solve all the ills afflicting the Irish Church or indeed other churches, but it calls us all to take the difficult journey of conversion; we are invited to rediscover the wellsprings of our tradition, an ever-fresh source of life. This summons is addressed to the Irish Church, but I think we all need to respond to it; the church is one and when one part of the Body of Christ suffers, the whole Body suffers.
Senator Chris Evans intervene!
Confirmation Date

Confirmation will be celebrated in the parish on Saturday, 15 May at 6pm by His Grace, the Archbishop of Perth. If you are a parishioner and have a child of confirmation age, who has been baptised in the Catholic Church and received his/her First Holy Communion, please pick up the enrolment form which is available in the foyer of the church. Please read the form carefully. The form needs to be returned at the Confirmation Commitment Mass. If you have any questions please contact the parish office
Blessed Mary MacKillop

Confirmation 2010
Blessed Mary MacKillop

It was made public yesterday (Friday) that the Holy Father will hold a public ordinary Consistory at the Sala del Concistoro of the Apostolic Palace, Vatican City on 19 February at 11am (Rome time). At the consistory it is expected that the Pope will decree the canonisation of Blessed Mary of the Cross (Mary Helen) MacKillop. This is not the formal canonisation ceremony which will take place at a time to be announced.

Pope John Paul II and penance
Ash Wedneday
Happy Australia Day
I must confess to a certain ambivalence about Australia Day Mass. We are called to incarnate the Gospel in our land and this will take a particular form because of the peculiarities of culture and land. But we Christians are citizens of heaven, pilgrims on this earth; we are brothers and sisters to all the baptised in God’s catholic church. This is more fundamental and important than distinctions of class, race or citizenship. Every Mass is a celebration of the Church universal as well as the church of a particular place.
In case this unity of the baptised seems rather insular I would point out that it is not for its own sake; it is a witness to the unity of the human family under God our Father.
Anyway a sense of history makes one realise that the idea of the nation-state is a modern one. Through history many temporal powers have sought to lay claim to our obedience; the nation is just the latest manifestation of this.
St Joseph Pignatelli

Thank you
The Record
Parliament of the world's religions
'Jesus was an asylum-seeker'
Shame on Turnbull and Abbott
I heard the Prime Minister on the ABC this morning. It was good to hear him emphasise the humane treatment of asylum-seekers. He also pointed to the many international factors driving the increase in asylum applications, most notably the situation in Sri Lanka.
Addendum: Sharman Stone was fear-mongering on television again. She disgraces her office.
'People-smugglers'
Rudd government is 'gutless'
Fools or knaves?
Misapprehensions
1. Asylum-seekers who arrive by boat are not entering the country illegally or 'queue-jumping'.
International law on refugees does not distinguish between those who arrive by sea or air. Indeed if they come by sea they are not arriving illegally since they have the right to seek asylum. Those who arrive by air and who then seek refugee status are here on some visa which does not entitlte them to refugee status; their claim for asylum has to assessed by the refugee tribunal.
2. I fail to see the reason for fear. Living in Italy I witnessed the plight of many people without papers (sans papier) who eke out a living on the streets. We do not have this problem here. Those who seek refugee status have their claims assessed. Indeed the evidence is that those who arrive by boat are inevitably intercepted off-shore and their claims then processed. We are not being flooded by boat-people who arrive on our shores and in some cladestine fashion slide into our communities without being processed. If one wanted to enter the country stay in the country illegally, one would do better to enter the country on a valid visa and overstay.
3. When we talk about refugees, we are not considering those who leave their country for economic reasons. That is another and valid question. We are considering those who fit within the definitions of international conventions as expressed in commonwealth laws.
4. A misapprehension about Christian discipleship. How can someone from a wealthy country face the Lord and say 'it was too difficult/awkward to help you in the littlest of my brothers and sisters'? How can a Christian disciple from a wealthy country like Australia say this when people from poor countries face greater challenges with regard to asylum-seekers every day? For shame!
A final word from Dietrich Bonhöffer - a hero of the Prime Minister:
'If the world despises one of the brethren, the Christian will love and serve him. If the world does him violence, the Christian will succour and comfort him. If the world dishonours and insults him, the Christian will sacrifice his honour to cover his brother's shame.... And where the world oppresses, he will stoop down and raise up the oppressed. If the world refuses justice, the Christian will pursue mercy.'
Some facts on refugees
These web sites have useful information:
UNHCR Australia
Refugee Council of Australia facts
And there is a good article in Crikey
New chairs in Ladychapel

We have comfy new chairs in the Ladychapel. Ten of the chairs have padded kneelers attached.
Mass time changes brought forward
Parish Dinner 2009
Israel and organ-harvesting?
Revised translation of the Roman Missal
Positive news
Solemnity of the Assumption
Happy feast day

On 8 August we celebrate the feast of Blessed Mary MacKillop. May she pray for us to God.
A way forward on the abortion debate?
BBC Reith Lectures
Political murder in Russia
Mandatory sentencing
Tu es Petrus

On the Solemnity of Ss Peter and Paul, we pray for Pope Benedict XVI, Successor to St Peter in the See of Rome.
Sunday Evening Mass
Our shame
Mission Sunday
Confirmation
The missing link
Some disturbing aspects of recent Irish history
I know many Irish priests - good, dedicated men. It would be very hard ministering in the circumstances in which they find themselves; they too need our prayers. The church in Ireland must rise again from the ashes. She is the church after all of St Patrick and St Brigid, a church which has given so much to the world over the centuries.
I came across two good articles in the Irish Times over the last week: one by Breda O’Brien calls for societal soul-searching; the other (which makes for disturbing reading) raises questions about the underlying factors which allowed the abuse to happen.
Confirmation
Pope's pilgrimage to the Holy Land
Nestlé
Break
Refugees
Catholics returning home
Victorian fires
The bishop and the Shoah
I was taken by an article by an American rabbi on the controversy.
The Secretariat of State has released the following statement:
"In the wake of reactions provoked by the recent Decree from the Congregation for Bishops lifting the excommunication on the four prelates of the Society of St. Pius X, and with reference to declarations denying and reducing the Shoah pronounced by Bishop Williamson, a member of that society, it is felt appropriate to clarify certain aspects of the issue:
1. Remission of the excommunication
"As has previously been explained, the Decree from the Congregation for Bishops, dated 21 January 2009, was an act by which the Holy Father benignly responded to repeated requests from the superior general of the Society of St. Pius X.
"His Holiness wished to remove an impediment that hindered the opening of a door to dialogue, and he now awaits a similar readiness to be expressed by the four bishops, in complete adherence to the doctrine and discipline of the Church.
"The extremely serious penalty of excommunication 'latae sententiae', which these bishops incurred on 30 June 1988, formally announced on 1 July of the same year, was a consequence of their illegitimate ordination by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.
"The remission of the excommunication has freed the four bishops from a serious canonical penalty, but it has not altered the juridical position of the Society of St. Pius X which, at the present time, enjoys no canonical recognition within the Catholic Church. Even the four bishops, though released from excommunication, have no canonical function in the Church and cannot legally exercise a ministry within her".
2. Tradition, doctrine and Vatican Council II
"An indispensable condition for any future recognition of the Society of St. Pius X is their full recognition of Vatican Council II and of the Magisterium of Popes John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul I, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI.
"As already affirmed in the Decree of 21 January 2009, the Holy See will not fail, in ways considered most appropriate, to join the parties concerned in a profound examination of outstanding issues, so as to be able to reach a full and satisfactory solution to the problems that gave rise to this painful split".
3. Declarations concerning the Shoah
"Msgr. Williamson's views on the Shoah are absolutely unacceptable, and firmly rejected by the Holy Father as he himself said on 28 January when, referring to that brutal genocide, he reiterated his complete and indisputable solidarity with our Brothers and Sisters who received the First Covenant, affirming that the memory of that terrible event must 'induce humankind to reflect upon the unpredictable power of evil when it conquers the heart of man', adding that the Shoah remains 'an admonition for everyone against oblivion, negation and reductionism, because violence against a single human being is violence against all'.
"In order to be readmitted to episcopal functions within the Church, Bishop Williamson must absolutely, unequivocally and publicly distance himself from his views concerning the Shoah, which were unknown to the Holy Father at the moment he lifted the excommunication.
"The Holy Father asks all the faithful to accompany him in prayer, that the Lord may illuminate the path of the Church. May all pastors and faithful increase their commitment in support of the delicate and onerous mission of the Successor of the Apostle Peter, the 'custodian of unity' within the Church".
Controversy over Papal address to the Curia
Alternative voices within Israel
Thank you
Facts on asylum-seekers
Deported to Danger
Archbishop's Golden Jubilee of Priesthood

Congratulations to our Archbishop who celebrates fifty years of priestly ministry on 20 December. Ad multos annos!
Pius XII
Avery Cardinal Dulles SJ

I have just read of the death of Avery Dulles SJ. Dulles was an exceptional theologian - I can still remember the impact his Models of the Church had on me in seminary. I was privileged to be present when Pope John Paul II created him a cardinal. You can read some of his articles for America online. May he rest in peace.
Vandalism
Christmas Choirs
Final Day for After-school children

parents.

Continuing injustice in Israel-Palestine
Why care? ‘Whatever you do to the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you do to me’.
Youth Music
The group will also be leading the singing at the Christmas Midnight Mass. Rehearsals will start after their debut Mass.
Shame!
The commentary on the case has missed the point - the main issue is not that a rural community will be denied the services of this doctor; it is that the immigration department is making an appalling value-judgement concerning a child with a disability.
An interesting religion report
Blessing of Exam Students


Youth Music
Youth Music
Blessing of Exam Students
Youth music
The next meeting for the group is this Saturday at 4.30pm.
Young people who play an instrument or sing are very welcome to join.
Everyone is invited to bring along hymns or Christians songs which they know and like to the Saturday rehearsal so that we can work out what the group is going to play. Please spread the word.
What does it mean to be pro-life?
Onaiyekan said Obama’s pro-choice record wouldn’t stop him from voting for the Democrat.
“The fact that you oppose abortion doesn’t necessarily mean that you are pro-life. You can be anti-abortion and still be killing people by the millions through war, through poverty, and so on.”
“Of course I believe that abortion is wrong, that it’s killing innocent life,” he said. “I also believe, however, that those who are against abortion should be consistent.... If my choice is between a person who makes room for abortion, but who is really pro-life in terms of justice in the world, peace in the world, I will prefer him to somebody who doesn’t support abortion but who is driving millions of people in the world to death.”
“It’s a whole package, and you never get a politician who will please you in everything,” he said. “You always have to pick and choose.”
Youth band
Lectio Divina
Benedictine page on lectio
Carmelite page on lectio
If you are searching for passages to pray this page gives the daily Gospel readings as a possible point of departure.
Two new links
One is a new podcast (you can also listen to it on your computer)

The other is an online journal put out by the British Jesuits.
Correction to Mass time on 25 September
Mass on Thursday 25 September is at 9am at SJP.
27 September - 5 October
Weekend Masses will follow the normal timetable
Saturday 6.30pm
Sunday 7.30am and 9.30am
A birthday morning tea with the Santa Mums


They didn’t like my irish name!

Asylum-seekers
Funeral Mass for Mona Stewart
Parish Dinner
First Communion
Prostitution Laws
The Solemnity of the Assumption
Funeral of Annie McCarthy
'Protection must be paramount'
Three cheers for the minister!
'The puzzling success of a deplorable book'
Thank you
Dulcie Thompson
World Youth Day begins
Cardinal Pell’s homily to the young people at the Opening Mass certainly made an impact. The Holy Father’s address today (Thursday) was profound. He reiterated a message which is dear to him - ‘Christ offers more! Indeed he offers everything!’ It was great to see the crowds at Barangaroo and so many lining the streets of the city.
An excuse to bash the Catholic Church
The Archbishop and the Bethel Community
Uri Avnery et al on Israel
There is an article by Frank Barat on the dreadful incident in which a bulldozer was driven into several vehicles.
And, finally, one by Brian Cloughley with a perspective on Israeli-American politics.
I must say that I have no intention of resiling from placing the links to the articles here. The patent injustice being inflicted on a people cries out to the heavens. The one-sidedness of the media coverage is appalling.
Opinions, reactions are welcome.
Rosary and Mass for Gerard della Maddalena
New committee members
A confronting article and an affecting tribute
Forget the two-state solution!
WorldWide Telescope
Israel and Palestine
The Mosque and Padua
An admirable, if not terribly popular, stand. Critics might point to Saudi Arabia and ask why we should acknowledge the rights of the muslim minority in Western countries when Christians are not even allowed to worship freely in certain Muslim countries. However, do we as a society, want to define ourselves in terms of the barbarism of Saudi Arabia or the intolerance of others?'A society that is called civilised should responsibly accept the religiosity of its citizens inasmuch as every person has the right to liberty of religion. This is appropriate also for a state which is lay (not secular) in the strong sense of the word. The proclamation of the principle of religious liberty, however, is sustained by the believer's having the concrete possibility of availing himself of places, spaces, rituals, publications, association and anything else as long as it is permitted by the constitutional framework and laws of the State.'
Burma tragedy
Trials and faith
Sometimes it is challenging to find a reason for what appears only as a difficulty to be overcome or even pain to be endured. Yet our faith helps us to break open the horizon beyond our own selves in order to see life as God does. God’s unconditional love, which bathes every human individual, points to a meaning and purpose for all human life. Through his Cross, Jesus in fact draws us into his saving love (cf. Jn 12:32) and in so doing shows us the way ahead - the way of hope which transfigures us all, so that we too, become bearers of that hope and charity for others.
A black day
Sorry
Ash Wednesday
Funeral Mass for Aileen Yensch
Funeral Mass for Wallace Cowie
Aileen Yensch
The Lost Tomb of Jesus and
Election Prayer
we pray for wisdom as we prepare to vote in the Federal election.
Give us a Parliament committed to the priorities of your kingdom,
so that peace, compassion, truth and justice may prevail among us,
and make us a blessing to all peoples, through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
God, save our Queen,
bless Australia,
guard our people
guide our leaders
and give us peace;
for Jesus Christ’s sake. Amen.
(adapted from a prayer by the Anglican Liturgy Commission)
Opportunity at Annapolis
Funeral of Neville Bullock

New catholics
Eureka Street
In response to Fr Brennan's article, Fr Middleton has written on the reasons behind his school's withdrawing from Amnesty. They now express their support for human rights through the Benenson Society.
I must say that I find Fr Middleton's reasoning compelling. Does not Amnesty's new position mean that the rights of the unborn are no longer of concern?
A dilemma
- After the brief concluded, Lori responded to a reporter’s question about another situation, in which one candidate may hold an anti-abortion position but oppose other concerns of the church, while that candidate's opponent may be pro-choice but sympathetic to the church in other ways.
- “That’s such a hypothetical question, it would be very hard to answer as asked,” Lori said. “I think what we are saying is that if a voter is confronted with a dilemma of a pro-life candidate who is in some other way flawed or unfit for office, or likely to discredit the pro-life position, one might be in a dilemma, a difficult situation.”
- “A situation could arise that the pro-life candidate would be in some other way unsuitable,” Lori said. “It could be that the way in which he would advance the pro-life cause might do more harm than good. It might be that his opposition to other human goods is so rabid that a conscientious voter might be put in a dilemma. In that case, you have to weigh that over against the other candidate.”
- “The main point of the statement,” Lori said, “is that you can’t easily reach that decision. You can’t reach it because you prefer one party over another, you can’t reach it because in addition to everything else the candidate is going to make you feel better. It can't be because of economic advantage.
- “You really have to go through some hoops to come to that conclusion,” Lori said. “I think that the more who go through those hoops, the better off we’re going to be.”
Two interesting reports
This site provides information on how WA members of the house of representatives and senators voted on two key life issues.
Alas, one wishes those with a passion for social justice were also passionate about the protection of unborn life and vice-versa.
Outdoor Mass
Two recommendations
The New York Times has interviewed Patriarch Emmanuel III Delly of Babylonia of the Chaldeans. The Patriarch is based in Iraq and the interview is absorbing.
Eureka Street
Horrific death toll
Prayer request
Eureka Street
The other article is on this country's approach to refugees in light of Kevin Andrew's latest proclamation. It is by David Holcroft SJ and here is the final paragraph which reads as a peroration:'Between the conception and the execution there is faith, hope — and courage.' Keating went on to say that 'it is never the people who let their countries down, but governments that 'lack heart', politicians who 'imagine things but don’t do them', bureaucrats who 'thwart initiative'.'
Such courage — which Watson later describes as 'Keating’s hallmark and his stock in trade … the prime element in the Keating mythos' — is defined by a leader’s willingness to wage war against the people’s baser instincts, to expand the public’s moral imagination rather than simply pander to avarice, to stare electoral oblivion in the face by defying popular opinion, to be willing to sacrifice oneself for the sake of a larger cause. In his justly famous address to the National Press Club on 7 December 1990, Keating lamented the absence of this kind of courageous leadership from Australian politics.
'We’ve got to be led, and politics is about leading people … The United States had three great leaders, Washington, Lincoln and Roosevelt, and at times in their history that leadership pushed them on to become the great country that they are. We’ve never had one such person, not one.'
The remainder of us must ask on what basis — on what set of values — do we wish to build our society? Is it one that seeks advantage over and separation from the weak and the voiceless of our world, or one that builds on compassion and the desire to pull our weight as a nation?
Federal Elections
Response from the Leader of the Opposition
Thank you for expressing your thoughts on Labor’s policy towards the death penalty.
Labor’s stance remains clear on this issue. We are universally opposed to executions carried out in any jurisdiction.
As signatories to the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights since 1989, we have committed to the global campaign for the elimination of this punishment.
As the ALP platform states:
Labor opposes the death penalty and believes that death by hanging, beheading, electrocution, firing squad, or stoning is inhumane, no matter what the crime. Labor in government will strongly and clearly state its opposition to the death penalty, whenever and wherever it arises and will use its position internationally and in the region to advocate for the universal abolition of the death penalty.
We believe that the best mechanism through which to pursue this global position is the United Nations. As part of this process, we will build diplomatic momentum by making representations to our regional neighbours and other countries.
In terms of individual interventions, a Labor Government would advocate for Australian citizens who are sentenced to the death penalty abroad. We would not use our diplomatic resources to intervene in individual cases of terrorists.
Global abandonment of the death penalty would serve not only to achieve the aspirations of the signatories to the Second Optional Protocol, but also to protect Australian citizens abroad.
Thank you for your correspondence on this important issue.
Hmmmm, nothing here to make me modify my earlier criticism. And I disagree strongly with the Prime Minister's claim that 'pleading for the execution of the Bali Bombers to be stopped is distasteful to Australians'. It may be distasteful to some Australians, but it is not distasteful to this Australian; and I do not think that my horror and outrage at the crimes of the bombers is less than the PM's.
By-the-bye, the Minister for Immigration has not responded to my letters (I don't think he likes me!). If I get a response I shall let you know.
Frank Brennan on the death penalty and voting
The Sudanese refugee issue
Bravo Robert McClelland
If we are opposed to the death penalty then we need to be consistent. The life of an Australian is not worth more than the life of a foreigner - contrary to Howard's assertion. All life is sacred and it is about time we had a government which actually stood for the principle despite the cries of the crowd for vengeance. In standing by this principle we are not disregarding the pain of the victims - which is great - but we are saying that healing does not come through death and vengeance, but through love, forgiveness and time (which can be a grace).
Eureka Street
Kevin Andrews and refugees - shades of Tampa, n'est-ce pas?
Birthday morning tea at Point Walter
Thanks to all for a lovely morning.



Don't we make a lovely couple!
Eureka Street
Australia and refugees
Parish Dinner
I felt like a babe in the woods!
The Parish Dinner was a great success. There was much conviviality, rich food and wines. Thanks to all who worked so hard to make it all happen, particularly the Parish Councillors. Cannot wait for next year's!
Protecting Australian Families Online
'The Pacific Solution: A $1 billion "living hell"'
Response to a letter
Articles in Eureka Street
Haneef developments
Peter Farris, writing in Crikey.com, is scathing of the decision. Greg Barns, also writing in Crikey, expresses the pro case rather well. You can read an explanatory statement and the full judgment here.
Australian Bishops on the Federal Elections
Amnesty International
The Assumption
Thanks
Eureka Street
The rest of the article can be read here. I must say that I share some of his concerns at the apparent silence of church leaders on the Haneef issue. Hamilton concludes:At the heart of Christian faith is the revelation of how deeply God loves each human being, and so how precious each person is. The heart of human dignity lies in the invitation God makes to each human being to live faithfully, and in the capacity of the person to respond. The most precious gift that human beings have is their freedom to respond freely. That freedom to respond also underlies the human need for community. The groups and institutions that people form, particularly the State, must respect their freedom to respond. They may not treat human beings as things that are simply the objects of regulation but as free subjects of their own destiny. That demands particularly a system in which punitive or discriminatory measures taken against people can be responded to effectively.
The other article is by Kerry Murphy. Click here.It is not easy to argue for the practical corollaries of the belief that each human being is precious. It runs against the cultural tide. But the argument will be lost if it is not conducted with integrity. That requires defending the dignity of those suspected of terrorism as well as of the unborn.
Trivia
Deus nobiscum quis contra - comes from Romans 8 si Deus nobiscum quis contra nos - 'if God be for us, who can be against us?'
Sedes Sapientiæ ora pro nobis - 'Seat of Wisdom, pray for us'. 'Seat of Wisdom' is a title for Our Lady. Jesus Christ is the Wisdom of God and this Wisdom found a home in Mary.
Nemo dat quod non habet - 'No one can give that which he does not have'.
NDA
Haneef
Palestine
This weekend
Further to my previous posts
RSS
Fr Ragheed Ganni
Appalling
Pre-emption of the judicial process and guilt by association make me fear for our society. By the bye, if our treatment of our neighbour, of the vulnerable in our midst, is not a faith-issue then might not faith turn into an opiate?
Thanks
New Vatican Documents
Pope Benedict's letter is not a return to pre-Vatican II days. One has only to listen to the addresses of the Pope to know that he is committed to the teaching of the Council. As I read it, it is an attempt to reach out to those who rejected the renewal initiated by the Council. However,some of these rejected not only the liturgical reforms, but also the Council's teaching on religious freedom and ecumenism and, as such, we should not expect immediate results from the Pope's initiative (and there will be no change in the church's teaching). I think that the Pope is also concerned that some hold the view that there is a disjunction between the pre- and post-Conciliar church; he is keen to emphasise the continuity.
With regard to the document of the Congregation, one should keep the clear position in the accompanying commentary to the fore - ecumenism remains a priority of the Catholic Church. We are not returning to a defensive or exclusivist posture with regard to our brothers and sisters of other churches and communions. But fruitful dialogue presupposes clarity and honesty as well as openness.
Interesting articles and analysis
Launch
© 2007-2010 St Joseph Pignatelli Parish. ABN: 64 936 045 714.




